About Me

Name: Jason Cunningham
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

Dear Matt Damon ... Sincerely, Jason Drexler

Dear Matt Damon,
 
In a recent interview, you opined about the supposed ridiculousness, and your great fear, of a Sarah Palin presidency, or even of a Palin vice presidency. Most of us have heard its infamous lines, I'm sure, in particular the one about a Palin presidency being like a "bad Disney movie."
 
(Here please insert your subpar rendition of "Ooh, I'm the Hockey Mom, facing down Vladimir Putin!")
 
The Liberal arrogance, and the sheer disdain you have for Palin and rural people, that came through in this interview were monumental and infuriating. At one point you mocked Palin by saying that she would handle crises with what you scathingly termed "folksy" wisdom; well, as someone who comes from a rural area (Maine) and would still prefer to live in a rural area (I'm now in "hip" Southern Cal, you see), and who learned many truths about life while growing up in the country, I find your "folksy" comment insulting.
 
I also find it illuminating, because it reveals just what the typical Hollywood celebrity thinks -- about the average American, and about conservatives. For all the Liberal ballyhoo about finally putting a woman in the White House, the nomination of Palin to the McCain ticket has made one thing clear: The only women whom Liberals want to see in positions of authority are Liberal women. In other words, for all the feminist blathering of Liberals such as yourself, what you guys really want is not an equal shake for the fairer sex, but simply more Liberals in power. Period. I guess this shouldn't be surprising -- judging by other Liberal notions ("feminism" means scantily clad women everywhere; 14-year-old girls should be able to have sex, and abortions), it was already clear that Liberals have quite a low opinion of women. (As a side note: It seems, then, that all the drivel coming out of Hollywood about "equal rights" -- for homosexuals, transgenders, women, Hispanics, radical college professors and every other "disadvantaged" group -- is nothing but a ploy to get homosexuals, transgenders, women, Hispanics, radical college professors and members of every other "disadvantaged" group who are Liberal into positions of authority, where they can wreak havoc with regular, conservative people such as myself.)
 
Another of your "criticisms" of Palin was that she believes that Earth is only a few thousand years old. And that has what to do with managing a country?
 
Listen, Mr. Damon, I, like you, believe that Earth is really old. This conflicts in no way, however, with my Christian faith, including my belief that God created everything. Your insinuation that a "young Earth" worldview in particular, or a Christian worldview in general, is a sign of limited intelligence makes me question your own capacity for rational thought. Science is a great thing, and I happen to believe that it's basically right in its guess as to Earth's age, but it's a fact that science is sometimes wrong -- as seems to be the case when it claims that global warming is entirely man-made, a claim that conveniently forgets the fact that Earth has gone through many natural warming and cooling cycles during its long history. No doubt we've contributed to the problem, and no doubt recycling and conservation are good ideas, but let's not make them holy relics, okay?
 
One other thing: No, I don't want an "elite" running the nation. I want someone who's intelligent, yes, someone earnest and understanding and wise and respectful, but these things are different than "elite" -- as far as the current political usage of the word, at least, which suggests someone who has a superiority complex and thinks they're smarter, cooler and just generally better than everyone else. That is, someone like you.
 
Thanks for your time. In the future, though, please remember to at least act as though you like us common folk, and feel free to circulate this letter among your high-falutin' socialist comrades.
 
Sincerely,
 
Jason Drexler
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Hillary and Barack: The Gutless Wonders

Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama have once again showed their spinelessness, and that their desire for worldly success is greater than their desire to do what's right.
 
Gen. Peter Pace, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, recently declared his belief that homosexuality is immoral. I commend Gen. Pace not only for sticking to his guns, but also for having a clear head on this issue in the first place. Clinton and Obama, on the other hand, receive only my disappointment and criticism. Both refused to comment initially on what Pace said, and finally on Thursday they each issued a statement ... declaring homosexuality moral ... after a homosexual advocacy group criticized them for their silence.
 
The situation should be obvious to anyone: they failed to initially respond because they feared alienating one side or the other, and when it came right down to it, they caved to the pressure of the advocates of immorality. Their initial inaction and their ultimate wrong action demonstrate several things:
 
1.) They don't have the courage it takes to stand up for what's right;
 
2.) They're more interested in grabbing power (the presidency) than in doing what's right;
 
3.) They're no longer qualified (if they ever were in the first place) to be the leader of our nation.
 
Anyone who continues to support either of them will only contribute to the further decay of our country's moral fiber. Besides that, why would any homosexual advocates support either of them now? If Hillary or Obama truly felt that homosexuality is moral and worthy of support, why didn't they say so right away? Likewise, even if either had ultimately agreed with Gen. Pace, I wouldn't trust their expressed "agreement." In either situation, they made a calculated move based on getting votes instead of doing the right thing. 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Reaction to RFK Remark Overblown

I'm not a Hillary Clinton fan -- in the least -- but the reaction to her remark about Robert Kennedy was blown way out of proportion. Upon review, it seems to me that she was simply making the point that there is still a slim ray of hope for her, and that there have been similar situations in past presidential primary races -- including the one during which RFK was assassinated. Whether you agree with her belief that she still has a chance is a different matter, but as far as the Kennedy comment, she wasn't trying to make political capital out of it; she was merely citing an historical precedent.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »